For brand owners, labels, sync libraries, and commissioners who need full ownership and the strongest possible chain of title. No AI-generated audio in the master. Both doctrines cleared independently.
A finished track produced through SCR's max-ownership pipeline, with no AI-generated audio remaining in the final master:
T3 is the tier where SCR's pipeline is engineered to clear both doctrines independently. The price reflects the engineering, the studio time, the human performance, and the documentation — not the disclosure-relief itself, which is the natural consequence of doing the production properly.
A full assignment of the master recording, OR an exclusive perpetual license at the same effective economics (your choice; assignment is the default; exclusive-perpetual is offered for commissioners who cannot accept a copyright assignment for tax or structural reasons).
Under assignment, you receive:
What SCR retains:
On the platforms. T3 tracks do not carry an AI-generated disclosure flag on any of our five target platforms (SoundCloud, Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music, TikTok). This is supported by the doctrine: per research/11 §4, when no AI-generated audio is in the master, no platform's disclosure rule applies. SCR's scr-legal agent verifies this at upload-gate by checking the AUTHORLOG against the matrix; we do not authorize a T3 no-disclose claim without a complete AUTHORLOG on file.
On copyright. T3 tracks are strongly copyrightable under the USCO January 2025 framework — they are human-performed and human-arranged, with AI used only as a pre-production tool. Under assignment, you can register the copyright in your name and exercise full owner-of-record rights.
The premium T3 price is justified by the dual clearance (copyright defensible AND platform-disclosure clear) plus the documentation that defends both. A track that clears only the copyright side is properly priced as T2 — and we will tell you that at commission rather than oversell. The T3 tier is reserved for productions where the pipeline genuinely delivers both clearances; we do not pad T3 with T2-quality production because the brand premium depends on the doctrine being credible.
On resale and sub-licensing. Under assignment, you can sub-license freely. You can re-license to your own clients (if you are an agency or sync library), bundle the track into a larger product (if you are a label or media company), or hold the track as catalogue. The Provenance Statement transfers with the track to downstream buyers, so any third party in your chain inherits the same defensible chain-of-title.
On disputes. If a platform or rights holder ever challenges the track's status, you provide the contract + AUTHORLOG + Provenance Statement. The AUTHORLOG documents every human intervention; the matrix in research/11 §4 maps the production pattern to the per-platform disclosure rule that does not apply; the Provenance Statement attests to the dual clearance. This is the strongest defense posture any AI-first label can produce in 2026.
On the doctrine evolution. Your bundle is pinned to the doctrine version live at commission date. If the published doctrine evolves (provider ToS shifts, platform rule tightens, court ruling reshapes interpretation), your contract terms do not change retroactively — you commissioned under v1.0, your track is governed by v1.0. The published doctrine on the SCR site shows the current version for new commissions; your bundle keeps your historical version forever.
Is T3 disclosure-relief defensible if a platform changes its policy?
The doctrine is defensible at commission date. If a platform's policy tightens (e.g., Spotify moves from "fully AI-generated" to SoundCloud-style "any AI audio in the upstream chain"), the matrix in research/11 §4 is updated and the IMPLICATIONS.md log records the change. T3 tracks already commissioned are pinned to the prior doctrine; new T3 commissions would be quoted against the updated doctrine. Your bundle's contractual scope does not change retroactively; SCR's published doctrine moves with the landscape.
What if my legal team wants to verify the AUTHORLOG independently?
Encouraged. The AUTHORLOG is structured to be auditable: every entry has a timestamp, a session reference, a performer or operator ID, and an equipment or tool reference. Your legal team can cross-check against studio bookings, contractor invoices, and the C2PA manifest's signed timestamp. SCR provides additional verification documentation on request.
Can I commission a T3 track and assign the copyright to a different entity (my client, a SPV, or a downstream buyer)?
Yes. The assignment under T3 can be made directly to any entity you nominate at contract sign. You can also receive the assignment and re-assign downstream — both paths are clean.
What is the realistic delivery time for T3?
Longer than T1 and T2 because of the studio time, live performance, and AUTHORLOG completeness requirements. Typical T3 delivery is 4–8 weeks from contract sign, depending on scope (single track vs EP, vocal availability, mastering engineer queue). T1 turnaround is 1–2 weeks; T2 is 2–4 weeks.
What if I want T3 but my budget is T2?
We will tell you honestly whether the production pattern you need supports a T2-priced T3-quality output or whether T2 is the right fit. Sometimes the right answer is to deliver a high-quality T2 with strong AUTHORLOG and disclose-honestly, rather than overreach on a T3 claim that the doctrine cannot defend. Our pricing is calibrated so the right tier for your use is the right tier; we do not upsell T3 for T2 use cases.
Is the T3 disclosure-relief legally risk-free?
Nothing legal is risk-free. T3 is the strongest defensible posture an AI-first label can produce in 2026 given the public state of the doctrine and the platform rules as of brief date. The risks are enumerated in research/11 §7; the mitigations are the monthly ToS monitor, the AUTHORLOG, the conservative default at upload-gate, and the quarterly doctrine review. T3 commissioners receive the risk register as part of their bundle and are encouraged to incorporate the relevant risks into their own due diligence.